🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.