🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie is an charming little “playful character”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a sizeable but guardian-like companion. Zephyr has “constant motion” and moves like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a gentle spirit.

A group of thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canadian entertainment facility have become pawns in a struggle between a defunct facility, public officials and welfare campaigners.

But those most familiar with the whales say the intense discussion over their future often fails to consider the nuances of the whales who, after living their entire lives in confinement, have been carefully observed by the caretakers who see them each day.

After the federal government prevented the export of the belugas to China, the controversial attraction near Niagara Falls where they are held stated it would consider to euthanize them unless the authorities funds the cost of keeping them alive. The nation’s marine resources official has rejected that request, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable situation.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Researchers say that belugas’ neuroanatomy, along with their mimicry abilities, cognitive challenges and group interactions indicate they are highly cognitive animals – something a former trainer discovered directly.

She spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a role that involved earning the trust of the marine predators.

“Establishing those bonds over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of affection. At the start, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so wonderful and rewarding.”

Burgess knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nevertheless amazed by the subtleties and unique traits in their dispositions. She formed a deep bond for a pair of whales with opposing personalities.

“Eve chose me. The other demanded work,” she said. “They transformed the way I understand bonding.”

Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s connection with the whales evolved against a backdrop of rising activist criticism to their captivity.

During her three years at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, succumbed. In total, 19 belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the facility ascribes to natural mortality, but which advocates say reflects the substandard environment in which they were kept.

The park did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes consequences of the closure. “Structural materials is falling apart from the tanks because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are curious and so they take pieces and swim around with fragments in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not reply to a inquiry, but earlier claimed: “The whales … obtain far higher quality health care and around the clock supervision than any individual in the UK, or other places.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was terminated from the facility in early March following the demise of Eos, an unwell beluga the employees had to euthanize. She said the park believed details of the incident were shared to the news outlets and she was released not long after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ fate has left her and staff members in anguish. She says the facility’s ultimatum to euthanize its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” task, adding any attempts to humanely kill even a one beluga would require “significant staff”, vehicles and heavy equipment.

“It’s impossible in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

She advocates for demands for the whales to be removed right away from the facility, with its deteriorating pools and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, Canada’s fisheries minister denied a bid to send the whales to China.

“Allowing the proposal would have meant a ongoing situation in enclosure and a return to performance for audiences,” the minister stated. “As the public, we know that whales belong in the ocean, not in enclosures for our entertainment. I could not in ethical standing authorize an relocation that would continue the conditions these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the minister’s statements reveal a more general misunderstanding of the realities of existence for belugas born in captivity.

“The people needs to grasp these are whales that have existed solely in captivity and they will need constant supervision for the foreseeable future,” she said. “The public just don’t understand that it’s not as simple as saying ‘end operations’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion

As decision makers attempt to find a answer, suggestions have been put forward, some of which have questionable practicality. One proposal called for the belugas to be let go into the wilds of northern regions – where whales are a important part of nourishment for Inuit communities.

A proposed protected area in the province of eastern Canada, which now received regulatory clearance, has shown to be most controversial. The prospective site, which includes 100 acres of protected cove, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain positive that it could in time represent a sustainable resolution for some of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s spoken with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “merely an trial” in the whales’ well-being.

Others say the possibility of a refuge represents a broader global shift away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a workable solution in the short term.

The project lead, director of the plan, said the location will replicate the cognitive activities and nutrition the whales obtain from caretakers, albeit in a significantly bigger area. He said after the medical condition of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|